From Automation to Autonomous Work in Transit to the Quantum Society

Abstract

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence is giving rise to a new class of systems: Artificial Intelligence Agents. Unlike traditional models, these agents not only analyze information, but can plan, act, and learn autonomously in complex environments. This article presents a clear and accessible view of the phenomenon from three complementary angles:


(1) its technical architecture —perception, planning, action and reflection—;
(2) its current use cases in key industries; and
(3) its organizational and prospective implications.

As a contemporary case, the Claude Opus 4.6 model of Anthropic is analyzed, highlighted for its explicit orientation towards sustained agentive work, multi-agent coordination (“agent teams”) and extended memory. Finally, the text situates these advances within the transition towards the “Quantum Society”, understood as the progressive convergence between artificial intelligence, quantum computing and photonic computing. It is argued that this process does not only represent a technological transformation, but a structural change that demands new human, organizational and institutional capacities

Keywords: AI agents; autonomy; multi-agent; knowledge work; Claude Opus 4.6; quantum computing; photonic computing; Quantum Society

1. Introduction: Why talk about AI agents today

In recent years, artificial intelligence has ceased to be an experimental technology and has become a critical infrastructure of the digital economy. Among its most significant developments is the emergence of Artificial Intelligence Agents, systems capable not only of analyzing information, but also of acting autonomously in real environments.

This shift raises fundamental questions: what exactly are agents, what technical resources enable them to perceive, plan, execute, and learn, what tasks are they already transforming in organizations and industries, and what future trajectories are shaping up when these systems converge with emerging computational infrastructures—including quantum computing and photonics? The purpose of this article is to offer a clear, documented, and action-oriented answer: to understand the present in order to anticipate the approaching threshold.

2. What is an Artificial Intelligence Agent?

An Artificial Intelligence Agent (AIA) is a system capable of perceiving its environment, making decisions, executing actions and evaluating its own results continuously. Unlike traditional AI systems, an agent doesn’t just respond to instructions:  it can initiate actions on its own, chain complex tasks, and improve over time through feedback loops.

Three features summarize the qualitative leap: (a) autonomy and adaptability (continuous operation and real-time adjustment); (b) chaining of actions (from a single request to a complete flow); and (c) persistent memory (ability to sustain complex projects without losing continuity).

3. Technical architecture of agents (the cognitive cycle)

AIAs operate through a continuous cycle of perception, planning, action, and reflection, underpinned by a layered architecture that integrates software, computational infrastructure, and—progressively—emerging technologies.

3.1 Perception

Perception allows information from the digital or physical environment (APIs, databases, documents, images, audio, video) to be captured and converted into actionable representations, relying on NLP, computer vision and pattern recognition, as well as layers of integration with business systems (ERP/CRM, etc.

3.2 Planning

Planning transforms what is perceived into objectives, strategies and sequences of actions. Foundational and reasoning models, orchestration engines (symbolic and hybrid), task graphs and short- and long-term memory intervene here to maintain coherence during execution.

3.3 Action

Action is the ability to intervene in the environment: use of external tools (code execution, automation/RPA), APIs and control systems, and an execution infrastructure (cloud, containers, 24/7 scalability). At this point, the agent goes from assistant to operational actor.

3.4 Reflection and learning

Reflection evaluates results against objectives, detects errors and optimizes flows through feedback loops. Continuous learning adjusts models, rules, and priorities, allowing the agent to be adaptive and evolutionary.

3.5 Computational Infrastructure and Emerging Convergence

Currently, the base is mostly classic (cloud/edge/HPC). However, convergence with quantum computing (optimization, advanced planning, simulation) and photonic computing (acceleration and energy efficiency) is anticipated, giving rise to hybrid architectures.

4. Current Use Cases (Why It Matters Now)

The adoption of AI agents is redefining workflows and productivity:

  • finance and accounting (reconciliation and analysis),
  • services and operations (support and care),
  • investigation and monitoring (entity tracking and persistence), and
  • automation of daily tasks (reading and synthesis of emails, reports, digests).

These cases show that agents already operate in real-world environments, although scaling depends on advances in memory, sustained planning, and multi-agent coordination.

5. Case Study: Claude Opus 4.6 as a Platform for Agentive Work

The release of Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic (February 2026) is presented as a leap in models explicitly oriented to sustained agentive work: more careful planning, longer duration of autonomous tasks and better ability to detect errors. In addition, it incorporates a context window of 1 million tokens (beta), aimed at operating with large volumes of information and extensive codebases.

5.1 From conversational models to persistent agent systems

Anthropic describes Opus 4.6 as an upgrade to its most advanced model, emphasizing planning capabilities, reliability in large codebases, and improved patching/debugging to “catch” bugs. These properties are critical for agents who must complete long flows without constant supervision.

5.2 “Agent teams”: multi-agent coordination

A distinctive feature is the introduction of “agent teams”, which allows tasks to be divided into subtasks and executed in parallel with coordination between agents, increasing the speed and organizational scale of digital work.

5.3 Extended memory and cognitive continuity

The extended context window and compaction mechanisms allow continuity to be maintained and operate on large documents or sets of information, reinforcing the viability of prolonged projects (code, analysis, documentation).

5.4 Implications

Opus 4.6 illustrates a transition: from AI that “responds” to AI that executes work. This point is central to understanding the leap in productivity and also the new challenges of governance, control and responsibility in organizational environments.

6. OpenClaw and the hybrid governance of personal agents

The case of OpenClaw shows another relevant dynamic: not only the evolution of the model, but also the evolution of the agent ecosystem. Peter Steinberger, creator of OpenClaw, announced his addition to OpenAI and stated that OpenClaw will move to a foundation and remain “open and independent.”

Various press reports also indicate that OpenAI has indicated that OpenClaw will “live” as an open-source project under a foundation structure with continuous support, while Steinberger will work on the “next generation of personal agents”.

This case can be accurately described as the integration of talent and structural sponsorship of an open project, rather than as a classic acquisition, and is relevant because it anticipates hybrid governance models for agentive infrastructures.

7. Towards the Quantum Society: convergence with quantum computing and photonics

The great threshold in the evolution of agents is outlined in their convergence with quantum computing and photonics. Although these technologies are in the early stages, their progressive integration anticipates new possibilities for optimization, advanced planning, simulation, and energy efficiency. In the proposed framework, this convergence is associated with the transition to the “Quantum Society”, which does not describe only a technological phase, but a reconfiguration of capabilities and structures.

8. Implications for organizations and human capacities

Agents are no longer just support tools: they are approaching the figure of operational actors capable of executing end-to-end processes. This requires new skills: design and supervision of agent flows, governance of data and tools, risk management, decision auditing and ethics applied to autonomous systems. From the perspective of Futures Architecture, agents amplify the need for anticipation: futures do not “arrive by themselves”, they are built from now on through technical and institutional decisions.

9. Conclusion: The Threshold

Developments in artificial intelligence are already transforming industries, organizations, and markets through the emergence of increasingly autonomous AI Agents. The future convergence of these agents with quantum computing and photonic computing is not an isolated technological event, but a civilizational change. Possible futures will not manifest spontaneously: they are being designed, negotiated and built in the present. Those who do not actively participate in this construction will hardly be able to influence the future they will inhabit.

Those who wish to advance in the personal, organizational and institutional preparation for these new realities we invite you to read our book THE THRESHOLD, architecture of futures, capacities and competencies for the transition to Quantum Society. Available in e-book and physical versions on Amazon Kindle.

REFERENCES

A. Agents, multi-agency and learning

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson.
Wooldridge, M. (2020). An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. Wiley.
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press.
Bommasani, R., et al. (2021). On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. Stanford CRFM.
Wei, J., et al. (2022). Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. arXiv.
Yao, S., et al. (2023). ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models. arXiv.

B. Anthropic and Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic. (2026, February 5). Introducing Claude Opus 4.6. “Introducing Claude Opus 4.6 – Anthropic”. Ropek, L. (2026, February 5). Anthropic releases Opus 4.6 with new ‘agent teams’. TechCrunch. TechCrunch.
Nuñez, M. (2026, February 5). Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 brings 1M token context and ‘agent teams’. VentureBeat. VentureBeat.
Lardinois, F. (2026, February 5). Anthropic debuts Opus 4.6 as a step-change for the enterprise. The New Stack. The New Stack.
Capoot, A. (2026, February 5). Anthropic launches Claude Opus 4.6 as AI moves toward “vibe working”. CNBC. CNBC. [letsdatascience.com] [aol.com] [firstpost.com] [moneycontrol.com] [zdnet.com]

C. OpenClaw, OpenAI, and Foundation (Hybrid Governance)

Steinberger, P. (2026, February 14–15). OpenClaw, OpenAI and the future. [steipete.me].
Reuters. (2026, February 15). OpenClaw founder Steinberger joins OpenAI, open-source bot becomes foundation. [Yahoo Finance].
Capoot, A., & Levy, A. (2026, February 15). OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger joining OpenAI, Altman says. CNBC. CNBC.
Ha, A. (2026, February 15). OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger joins OpenAI. TechCrunch. [TechCrunch].
Swain, G. (2026, February 16). OpenAI hires OpenClaw founder as AI agent race intensifies. Computerworld. [Computerworld]. [anthropic.com]

D. Quantum Computing, Photonics and the Quantum SocietyNielsen, M., & Chuang, I. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.
Biamonte, J., et al. (2017). Quantum Machine Learning. Nature.
BenShlomi, R. (2025). Photonic computing and the future of AI. World Economic Forum.
Ventocilla Cuadros, E. (2025). The Threshold: architecture of futures, capacities and competencies for the transition to the Quantum Society. The Ox of the Sea / Kindle.